Litcius/Paper detail

Improving assessment and management of pain in hemophilia: an Italian Delphi consensus statement

Cristina Santoro, Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno, Antonio Corcione, Giovanni Di Minno, Marco Martinelli, Maria Elisa Mancuso, Benedetto Acone, Angelo Claudio Molinari, Emilio Valter Passeri, Angiola Rocino, Rita Santoro, Annarita Tagliaferri, Consalvo Mattia

2021Blood Reviews18 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines and well-validated assessment scales for pain in people with hemophilia (PwH) are needed. Here, we report 28 statements covering five topics on pain assessment and management in pediatric and adult PwH that were developed by 60 Italian hemophilia specialists during a Delphi consensus process. Overall, a clear consensus was achieved for 19 of the 28 statements. Consensus was reached on all statements on the topic of pain assessment and quality of life (QoL), including the need for regular pain assessment on a quantitative scale, the importance of distinguishing between different pain types, and the need to evaluate the impact of pain on patient QoL. The other four topics concerned acute and chronic pain management in adults and in children. Consensus was reached on statements regarding non-pharmacologic treatment and the use of first-line paracetamol (acetaminophen). There was a lack of consensus regarding the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, or opioids.

Topics & Concepts

Delphi methodMedicineDelphiQuality of life (healthcare)Pain managementAcetaminophenPain assessmentConsensus conferencePhysical therapyStatement (logic)Intensive care medicineNursingAnesthesiaInternal medicineLawComputer scienceMathematicsPolitical scienceOperating systemStatisticsHemophilia Treatment and Research