Litcius/Paper detail

Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? the challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies

Vasiliki Mollaki

2024Research Ethics54 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Peer review facilitates quality control and integrity of scientific research. Although publishing policies have adapted to include the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, such as Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), in the preparation of manuscripts by authors, there is a lack of guidelines or policies on whether peer reviewers can use such tools. The present article highlights the lack of policies on the use of AI tools in the peer review process (PRP) and argues that we need to go beyond policies by creating transparent procedures that will enable journals to investigate allegations of non-compliance and take decisions that will protect the integrity of the peer review system. Reviewers found to violate relevant policies must be excluded from the process to safeguard the integrity of the peer review system.

Topics & Concepts

PublishingPeer reviewAcademic integrityProcess (computing)Computer scienceQuality (philosophy)Engineering ethicsInternet privacyComputer securityPolitical scienceEngineeringLawOperating systemPhilosophyEpistemologyArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics in Clinical ResearchAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? the challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies | Litcius