A systematic review of nerve-sparing surgery for high-risk prostate cancer
Andrey Morozov, ESUT-YAUWP Group, Éric Barret, Domenico Veneziano, Vagarshak GRIGORYAN, Georg Salomon, I.V. Fokin, Mark Taratkin, Elena Poddubskaya, Juan Gómez Rivas, Stefano Puliatti, Zhamshid Okhunov, Giovanni Cacciamani, Enrico Checcucci, José L. MARENCO JIMÉNEZ, Dmitry Enikeev
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We provide a systematic analysis of nerve-sparing surgery (NSS) to assess and summarize the risks and benefits of NSS in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We have undertaken a systematic search of original articles using 3 databases: Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Original articles in English containing outcomes of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-risk PCa were included. The primary outcomes were oncological results: the rate of positive surgical margins and biochemical relapse. The secondary outcomes were functional results: erectile function (EF) and urinary continence.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The rate of positive surgical margins differed considerably, from zero to 47%. The majority of authors found no correlation between NSS and a positive surgical margin rate. The rate of biochemical relapse ranged from 9.3% to 61%. Most of the articles lacked data on odds ratio (OR) for positive margin and biochemical relapse. The presented results showed no effect of nerve sparing (NS) on positive margin (OR=0.81, 0.6-1.09) or biochemical relapse (hazard ratio [HR]=0.93, 0.52-1.64). A strong association between NSS and potency rate was observed. Without NSS, between 0% and 42% of patients were potent, with unilateral 79-80%, with bilateral - up to 90-100%. Urinary continence was not strongly associated with NSS and was relatively good in both patients with and without NSS.CONCLUSIONS: NSS may provide benefits for patients with urinary continence and significantly improves EF in high-risk patients. Moreover, it is not associated with an increased risk of relapse in short- and middle-term follow-up. However, the advantages of using such a surgical technique are unclear.