Risk Factors for Reoperation to Promote Union in 1111 Distal Femur Fractures
Christopher Lee, Dane J. Brodke, Nathan N. O’Hara, Sai K. Devana, Adolfo Hernandez, Cynthia E. Burke, Jayesh Gupta, Natasha S. McKibben, Robert V. O’Toole, John Morellato, Hunter Gillon, Murphy Walters, Colby Barber, Paul W. Perdue, Graham J. DeKeyser, Lillia Steffenson, Lucas S. Marchand, Marshall James Fairres, Loren O. Black, Zachary M. Working, Erika Roddy, Ashraf N. El Naga, Matthew Hogue, Trevor R. Gulbrandsen, Omar Atassi, Thomas Mitchell, Stephen Shymon
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors for reoperation to promote union after distal femur fracture. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Ten Level-I trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients with OTA/AO 33A or C distal femur fractures (n = 1111). INTERVENTION: Surgical fixation of distal femur fracture. Fixation constructs were classified as lateral plate, dual plate, nail, or nail plate combination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The outcome of interest was unplanned reoperation to promote union. RESULTS: There was an 11% (121/1111) rate of unplanned reoperation to promote union. In the multivariate analysis, predictive factors included body mass index [odds ratio (OR) = 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.32; P < 0.01], intra-articular fracture (OR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.01-2.45; P = 0.04), type III open injury (OR = 2.29; 95% CI, 1.41-3.72; P < 0.01), the presence of medial comminution (OR = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.14-3.06; P = 0.01), and medial translation on postoperative radiographs (OR = 1.23 per one 10th of condylar width; 95% CI, 1.01-1.48; P = 0.03). Construct type was not significantly predictive. CONCLUSIONS: Eleven percent of distal femur fractures underwent unplanned reoperation to promote union. Body mass index, intra-articular fracture, type III open injury, medial comminution, and medial translation on postoperative radiographs were predictive factors. Construct type was not associated with unplanned reoperation; however, this conclusion was limited by small numbers in the dual plate and nail plate groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.