Ducted Fuel Injection vs. Conventional Diesel Combustion: Extending the Load Range in an Optical Engine with a Four-Orifice Fuel Injector

Abstract

<div>Ducted fuel injection (DFI) is a technique to attenuate soot formation in compression ignition engines relative to conventional diesel combustion (CDC). The concept is to inject fuel through a small tube inside the combustion chamber to reduce equivalence ratios in the autoignition zone relative to CDC. DFI has been studied at loads as high as 8.5 bar gross indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP<sub>g</sub>) and as low as 2.5 bar IMEP<sub>g</sub> using a four-orifice fuel injector. Across previous studies, DFI has been shown to attenuate soot emissions, increase NO<sub>x</sub> emissions (at constant charge dilution), and slightly decrease fuel conversion efficiencies for most tested points. This study expands on the previous work by testing 1.1 bar IMEP<sub>g</sub> (low-load/idle) conditions and 10 bar IMEP<sub>g</sub> (higher-load) conditions with the same four-orifice fuel injector, as well as examining potential causes of the degradations in NO<sub>x</sub> emissions and fuel conversion efficiencies. DFI and CDC are directly compared at each operating point in the study. At the low-load condition, the intake charge dilution was swept to elucidate the soot and NO<sub>x</sub> performance of DFI. The low-load range is important because it is the target of impending, more-stringent emissions regulations, and DFI is shown to be a potentially effective approach for helping to meet these regulations. The results also indicate that DFI likely has slightly decreased fuel conversion efficiencies relative to CDC. The increase in NO<sub>x</sub> emissions with DFI is likely due to longer charge gas residence times at higher temperatures, which arise from shorter combustion durations and advanced combustion phasing relative to CDC.</div>

Topics & Concepts