Use of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard to Improve Readability of ChatGPT's Answers to Common Questions About Lung Cancer and Lung Cancer Screening
Hana L. Haver, Cheng Ting Lin, Arlene Sirajuddin, Paul H. Yi, Jean Jeudy
Abstract
ChatGPT’s responses to questions about lung cancer and LCS, although deemed clinically appropriate by cardiothoracic radiologists, were difficult to read. Simplified responses from three LLMs (ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard) had improved reading ease and readability (in terms of U.S. grade levels). However, some simplified responses were no longer clinically appropriate.
Topics & Concepts
ReadabilityMedicineLung cancerReading (process)LungCancerLung cancer screeningMedical physicsOncologySurgeryRadiologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineLinguisticsPhilosophyArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment