Litcius/Paper detail

Comparison of intrarenal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever between standard- and mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Dechao Feng, Xiongfeng Zeng, Ping Han, Xin Wei

2020Translational Andrology and Urology19 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High intrarenal pelvic pressure (IPP) induces systemic absorption of irrigation fluid containing bacteria or endotoxins, which is associated with postoperative fever (POF) and even urosepsis. The emphasis of this meta-analysis lies in comparison of IPP and POF between mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and standard-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SPCNL). METHODS: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from electronic databases from inception to November 2019. Studies selection, quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were accomplished by two independent reviewers using Cochrane Collaboration's tools. RESULTS: =0%). The two procedures was comparable on stone-free rate (SFR) (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.61-1.86, P=0.83) and operation time (MD: 5.69, 95% CI: -4.54 to 15.91, P=0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence indicates that MPCNL is an effective alternative to SPCNL with comparable SFR. IPP and POF is significantly higher during MPCNL compared to SPCNL. Intraoperative detection of IPP is of great significance for ensuring safety and reducing postoperative complications, especially for patients with MPCNL and the duration of stone fragmentation. Further large well-designed trials are warranted to confirm our findings.

Topics & Concepts

Percutaneous nephrolithotomyMedicineRandomized controlled trialConfidence intervalOdds ratioMeta-analysisRelative riskCochrane LibraryInternal medicinePostoperative feverSurgeryUrologyPercutaneousKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsPaleopathology and ancient diseasesAbdominal Surgery and Complications