Litcius/Paper detail

Plausibility of CAAD in Conceptual Design: Challenges in Architectural Engineering for Early-Stage Digital Design Tools

Salem Buhashima Abdalla, Mamun Rashid, Dilshad Rahat Ara

2021Journal of Architectural Engineering15 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Although the reasons for and against the early use of digital tools in design have been intensively researched and studied for years, there has been a scarcity of substantial analysis of the challenges posed by using computer-assisted architectural design (CAAD) tools in the early design phase. By drawing on reviewed materials and cross-mapping digital software and current commercially available programs, this paper elucidates and evaluated the impact of CAAD tools in the early design process. In this research, a two-way, systematic mapping of research-based tools that support the conceptual design process and commercial CAAD methods was implemented, utilizing five criteria as illustrated in a recent study. The paper concludes with three scenarios of CAAD’s future direction, which will have an impact on conventional architectural engineering, as well as architectural practice and education.

Topics & Concepts

Conceptual designEngineeringEngineering design processArchitectural designProcess (computing)Systems engineeringSoftwareSoftware engineeringArchitectural engineeringComputer scienceArchitectureMechanical engineeringVisual artsProgramming languageOperating systemArtDesign Education and PracticeArchitecture and Computational DesignBIM and Construction Integration
Plausibility of CAAD in Conceptual Design: Challenges in Architectural Engineering for Early-Stage Digital Design Tools | Litcius