Litcius/Paper detail

Methodology of Natsal-COVID Wave 1: a large, quasi-representative survey with qualitative follow-up measuring the impact of COVID-19 on sexual and reproductive health in Britain

Emily Dema, Andrew Copas, Soazig Clifton, Anne Conolly, Margaret Blake, Julie Riddell, Raquel Bosó Pérez, Clare Tanton, Chris Bonell, Pam Sonnenberg, Catherine H Mercer, Kirstin Mitchell, Nigel Field

2021Wellcome Open Research18 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

<ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Background:</ns3:bold> Britain’s National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal) have been undertaken decennially since 1990 and provide a key data source underpinning sexual and reproductive health (SRH) policy. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted many aspects of sexual lifestyles, triggering an urgent need for population-level data on sexual behaviour, relationships, and service use at a time when gold-standard in-person, household-based surveys with probability sampling were not feasible. We designed the Natsal-COVID study to understand the impact of COVID-19 on the nation’s SRH and assessed the sample representativeness. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Methods:</ns3:bold> Natsal-COVID Wave 1 data collection was conducted four months (29/7-10/8/2020) after the announcement of Britain’s first national lockdown (23/03/2020). This was an online web-panel survey administered by survey research company, Ipsos MORI. Eligible participants were resident in Britain, aged 18-59 years, and the sample included a boost of those aged 18-29. Questions covered participants’ sexual behaviour, relationships, and SRH service use. Quotas and weighting were used to achieve a quasi-representative sample of the British general population. Participants meeting criteria of interest and agreeing to recontact were selected for qualitative follow-up interviews. Comparisons were made with contemporaneous national probability surveys and Natsal-3 (2010-12) to understand bias. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Results:</ns3:bold> 6,654 participants completed the survey and 45 completed follow-up interviews. The weighted Natsal-COVID sample was similar to the general population in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, rurality, and, among sexually-active participants, numbers of sexual partners in the past year. However, the sample was more educated, contained more sexually-inexperienced people, and included more people in poorer health. </ns3:p> <ns3:p> <ns3:bold>Conclusions:</ns3:bold> Natsal-COVID Wave 1 rapidly collected quasi-representative population data to enable evaluation of the early population-level impact of COVID-19 and lockdown measures on SRH in Britain and inform policy. Although sampling was less representative than the decennial Natsals, Natsal-COVID will complement national surveillance data and Natsal-4 (planned for 2022). </ns3:p>

Topics & Concepts

Representativeness heuristicReproductive healthPopulationSample (material)Reproductive medicineDemographyData collectionQualitative propertyMedicinePsychologySocial psychologySociologyBiologySocial scienceComputer scienceChemistryChromatographyMachine learningPregnancyGeneticsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthHealth disparities and outcomesHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Methodology of Natsal-COVID Wave 1: a large, quasi-representative survey with qualitative follow-up measuring the impact of COVID-19 on sexual and reproductive health in Britain | Litcius