OpenSFDI: an open-source guide for constructing a spatial frequency domain imaging system
Matthew B. Applegate, Kavon Karrobi, Joseph P. Angelo, Wyatt M. Austin, Syeda Tabassum, Enagnon Aguénounon, Karissa Tilbury, Rolf B. Saager, Sylvain Gioux, Darren Roblyer
Abstract
<bold>Significance</bold>: Spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) is a diffuse optical measurement technique that can quantify tissue optical absorption (μ<sub>a</sub>) and reduced scattering (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Measurements of μ<sub>a</sub> at different wavelengths enable the extraction of molar concentrations of tissue chromophores over a wide field, providing a noncontact and label-free means to assess tissue viability, oxygenation, microarchitecture, and molecular content. We present here openSFDI: an open-source guide for building a low-cost, small-footprint, three-wavelength SFDI system capable of quantifying μ<sub>a</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as well as oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin concentrations in biological tissue. The companion website provides a complete parts list along with detailed instructions for assembling the openSFDI system. <bold>Aim</bold>: We describe the design of openSFDI and report on the accuracy and precision of optical property extractions for three different systems fabricated according to the instructions on the openSFDI website. <bold>Approach</bold>: Accuracy was assessed by measuring nine tissue-simulating optical phantoms with a physiologically relevant range of μ<sub>a</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the openSFDI systems and a commercial SFDI device. Precision was assessed by repeatedly measuring the same phantom over 1 h. <bold>Results</bold>: The openSFDI systems had an error of 0 ± 6 % in μ<sub>a</sub> and −2 ± 3 % in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared to a commercial SFDI system. Bland–Altman analysis revealed the limits of agreement between the two systems to be ± 0.004 mm<sup> − 1</sup> for μ<sub>a</sub> and −0.06 to 0.1 mm<sup> − 1</sup> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The openSFDI system had low drift with an average standard deviation of 0.0007 mm<sup> − 1</sup> and 0.05 mm<sup> − 1</sup> in μ<sub>a</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. <bold>Conclusion</bold>: The openSFDI provides a customizable hardware platform for research groups seeking to utilize SFDI for quantitative diffuse optical imaging.