Litcius/Paper detail

Role of consistent terminology in XPS reproducibility

Donald R. Baer, Alexander G. Shard

2020Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films35 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The use of inconsistent and incorrect terminology in scientific publications contributes to misunderstanding, confusion, and erroneous results in the scientific literature. This issue is of particular importance in x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) that is in widespread use for many different purposes by scientists with diverse backgrounds. A set of surface analysis terminology, approved through consensus by international experts, has been developed by International Organization for Standardization Technical Committee TC201 on Surface Chemical Analysis. To encourage wide use, the terminology is accessible at several web sites at no cost. This short overview provides examples to highlight the importance of agreed terminology in eliminating confusion between similar terms. Examples are provided of terms that are commonly misused or confused in the literature. Other examples highlight terminology that provides a common basis for comparing instrument parameters and performance. As science advances, it is important to clarify terminology for describing evolving concepts and developments important to XPS.

Topics & Concepts

TerminologyConfusionStandardizationSet (abstract data type)Scientific literatureComputer scienceData scienceManagement scienceEngineering ethicsPsychologyEngineeringLinguisticsPhilosophyBiologyProgramming languageOperating systemPsychoanalysisPaleontologyElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy TechniquesX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Role of consistent terminology in XPS reproducibility | Litcius