Litcius/Paper detail

Refining the cold atom pressure standard

Pinrui Shen, Kirk W. Madison, James L. Booth

2021Metrologia22 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract In our previous work (Shen et al 2020 Metrologia 57 025015; Booth et al 2019 New J. Phys. 21 102001), we have reported the first primary quantum pressure standard based on the loss rate of cold rubidium atoms from a magnetic trap. We have shown that this standard is self-calibrating. That is, the single parameter required to quantify the pressure or particle flux impinging on the sensor atoms, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mfenced close="⟩" open="⟨"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> , can be determined experimentally. In this paper, we refine our procedure to extract the trap loss rate coefficient by expressing the measured trap loss rate of the rubidium atoms as a convolution of the universal loss rate expression from Shen et al (2020 Metrologia 57 025015) and Booth et al (2019 New J. Phys. 21 102001) with the energy distribution of the rubidium atoms in the trap. We report improved <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mfenced close="⟩" open="⟨"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>σ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> values for 87 Rb– X ( X = He, Ar, Xe, H 2 , N 2 , and CO 2 ) collision pairs. All are systematically higher than our previously reported values, although the differences are less than 2%. The calibration factor of an ionization gauge for nitrogen obtained using the cold atom standard, i g = 0.950 (19), agrees with the value obtained by NIST, i g = 0.940 (26) calibrated against their orifice flow standard.

Topics & Concepts

RubidiumPhysicsAtomic physicsMaterials sciencePotassiumMetallurgyCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Refining the cold atom pressure standard | Litcius