Photon-counting detector CT allows significant reduction in radiation dose while maintaining image quality and noise on non-contrast chest CT
Achala Donuru, Tetsuro Araki, Farouk Dako, Jaydev K. Dave, Raul Porto Perez, Dongming Xu, Arun C. Nachiappan, Eduardo Mortani Barbosa, Peter B. Noël, Harold Litt, Friedrich Knollman
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate if clinical non-contrast chest CT studies obtained with PCD CT using much lower radiation exposure can achieve the same image quality as with the currently established EID protocol. Materials/methods: A total of seventy-one patients were identified who had a non-contrast chest computed tomography (CT) done on PCD CT and EID CT scanners within a 4-month interval. Five fellowship trained chest radiologists, blinded to the scanner details were asked to review the cases side-by-side and record their preference for images from either the photon-counting-detector (PCD) CT or the energy-integrating detector (EID) CT scanner. Results: The median CTDIvol for PCD-CT system was 4.710 mGy and EID system was 7.80 mGy (p < 0.001). The median DLP with the PCD-CT was 182.0 mGy.cm and EID system was 262.60 mGy.cm (p < 0.001). The contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was superior on the PCD-CT system 59.2 compared to the EID-CT 53.3; (p < 0.001). Kappa-statistic showed that there was poor agreement between the readers over the image quality from the PCD and EID scanners (κ = 0.19; 95 % CI: 0.12 - 0.27; p < 0.001). Chi-square analysis revealed that 3 out of 5 readers showed a significant preference for images from the PCDCT (p ≤ 0.012). There was no significant difference in the preferences of two readers between EID-CT and PCD-CT images. Conclusion: The first clinical PCD-CT system allows a significant reduction in radiation exposure while maintaining image quality and image noise using a standardized non-contrast chest CT protocol.