Litcius/Paper detail

Real-world effects of antidepressants for depressive disorder in primary care: population-based cohort study

Franco De Crescenzo, Riccardo De Giorgi, César Garriga, Qiang Liu, Seena Fazel, Orestis Efthimiou, Julia Hippisley‐Cox, Andrea Cipriani

2024The British Journal of Psychiatry13 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants' effects are established in randomised controlled trials (RCTs), but not in the real world. AIMS: To investigate real-world comparative effects of antidepressants for depression and compare them with RCTs. METHOD: We performed a cohort study based on the QResearch database. We included people with a newly recorded diagnosis of depression, exposed to licensed antidepressants in the UK. We assessed all-cause dropouts (acceptability), dropouts for adverse events (tolerability), occurrence of at least one adverse event (safety), and response and remission on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 (effectiveness) at 2 and 12 months. Logistic regressions were used to compute adjusted-odds ratio (aOR) with 99% CIs, assessing the associations between exposure to each antidepressant against fluoxetine (comparator) and outcomes of interest. We compared estimates from the real world with RCTs using ratio-of-odds ratio (ROR) with 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 673 177 depressed people were studied: females 57.1%, mean age 42.8 (s.d. 17.7) years, mean baseline PHQ-9 17.1 (s.d. 5.0) (moderately severe depression). At 2 months, antidepressant acceptability was 61.4%, tolerability 94.4%, safety 54.5%, PHQ-9 decreased to 12.3 (s.d. 6.5). At 12 months, acceptability was 12.3%, tolerability 87.5%, safety 28.8%, PHQ-9 12.9 (s.d. 6.8). In the short and long term, tricyclics, mirtazapine and trazodone were worse than fluoxetine for most outcomes; citalopram had better acceptability than fluoxetine (aOR 0.95; 99% CI 0.92, 0.97), sertraline had lower tolerability (aOR 1.12; 99% CI 1.06, 1.18), and both citalopram and sertraline had lower safety (aOR 1.17 and 1.25, respectively). In the long term, citalopram had better acceptability (aOR 0.78; 99% CI 0.76, 0.81) and effectiveness (aOR 1.12 for both response and remission), but worse tolerability (aOR 1.09; 99% CI 1.06, 1.13) and safety (aOR 1.12; 99% CI 1.08, 1.16). Observational and randomised data were similar for citalopram and sertraline, while there was some difference for drugs less prescribed in the real world. CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressants showed low acceptability, moderate-to-high tolerability and safety, and small-to-moderate effectiveness in the real world. Real-world and RCT estimates showed similar findings only when the analyses were carried out using large datasets; otherwise, the results diverged.

Topics & Concepts

TolerabilityMedicineSertralineInternal medicineMirtazapineFluoxetinePatient Health QuestionnaireMajor depressive disorderOdds ratioCitalopramTrazodonePsychiatryMajor depressive episodeAdverse effectCohortDepression (economics)AntidepressantPopulationCohort studyMoodDepressive symptomsEnvironmental healthEconomicsAnxietyHippocampusMacroeconomicsSerotoninReceptorTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and AccessCardiac Health and Mental Health
Real-world effects of antidepressants for depressive disorder in primary care: population-based cohort study | Litcius