Litcius/Paper detail

Efficacy and safety of topical resorcinol 15% versus topical clindamycin 1% in the management of mild‐to‐moderate hidradenitis suppurativa: A retrospective study

Elisa Molinelli, Valerio Brisigotti, Oriana Simonetti, Claudia Sapigni, Giovanni D’Agostino, Giulio Rizzetto, Alfredo Giacchetti, Annamaria Offidani

2022Dermatologic Therapy31 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Topical and systemic antibiotic therapy remains the first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, literature data on antibiotic resistance in HS are growing. A total of 134 patients with mild-to-moderate HS were retrospectively evaluated. Seventy-three patients (group A) received topical clindamycin 1% and 61 patients (group B) received topical resorcinol 15%. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of topical 15% resorcinol versus topical 1% clindamycin in mild-to-moderate HS, comparing the clinical response at 12 weeks of treatment. Patients treated with resorcinol 15% showed a significant improvement in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System, and Pain Visual Analogue Scale score from baseline compared to patients treated with clindamycin 1%. Topical resorcinol 15% could be a valid alternative to clindamycin in the management of acute and long-standing HS, limiting antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineHidradenitis suppurativaTolerabilityClindamycinDermatologyResorcinolAntibioticsInternal medicineSurgeryAdverse effectMicrobiologyDiseaseOrganic chemistryChemistryBiologyHidradenitis Suppurativa and TreatmentsColorectal and Anal CarcinomasAnorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Efficacy and safety of topical resorcinol 15% versus topical clindamycin 1% in the management of mild‐to‐moderate hidradenitis suppurativa: A retrospective study | Litcius