Litcius/Paper detail

Economic viability and life cycle assessment of levulinic acid and hydrochar production via catalytic hydrothermal process of waste lignocellulosic biomass: A comparison of feedstock types

Kamonwat Nakason, Sanchai Kuboon, Jakkapon Phanthuwongpakdee, Wasawat Kraithong, Anan Jiratanachotikul, Bunyarit Panyapinyopol, Vorapot Kanokkantapong

2025Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering11 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Techno economic (TEA) and life cycle assessments (LCA) were conducted to compare the feasibility for scaling up of levulinic acid (LA) and hydrochar (HC) production from five biomass types. This investigation demonstrated for the first time the potential of reusing HC as fuel for LA production. Molasses (ML) yielded the highest LA product, while corn stalk (CS) demonstrated superior economic viability (22.81 % internal rate of return) due to its lower feedstock cost and HC reuse as an energy source. While, ML-based LA had the lowest environmental impact (27.61 kg CO 2 eq./kg LA), emphasizing the importance of biomass selection.

Topics & Concepts

Levulinic acidBiomass (ecology)Raw materialLignocellulosic biomassHydrothermal circulationPulp and paper industryWaste managementCatalysisLife-cycle assessmentChemistryProcess (computing)Environmental scienceProduction (economics)Chemical engineeringBiofuelOrganic chemistryEcologyEngineeringBiologyEconomicsComputer scienceMacroeconomicsOperating systemCatalysis for Biomass ConversionBiofuel production and bioconversionThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Economic viability and life cycle assessment of levulinic acid and hydrochar production via catalytic hydrothermal process of waste lignocellulosic biomass: A comparison of feedstock types | Litcius