Litcius/Paper detail

Recognizing culturally significant species and Indigenous‐led management is key to meeting international biodiversity obligations

Teagan Goolmeer, Anja Skroblin, Chrissy Grant, Stephen van Leeuwen, Ricky Archer, Cissy Gore‐Birch, Brendan A. Wintle

2022Conservation Letters55 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Increasingly the importance of Indigenous participation is acknowledged as central to effective biodiversity conservation. Traditional management emphasizes the importance of a holistic, integrated approach to safeguard species and ecological communities of cultural significance. This is discordant with many instruments for biodiversity conservation. Indigenous Australians have consistently lobbied for domestic laws to be amended to establish comanagement as the preferred approach to managing significant species and ecological communities – an approach that aligns with international obligations such as the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. We describe amendments to Australia's biodiversity legislation and the use of biocultural indicators that would support Traditional management of Culturally Significant Entities (species and ecological communities), and in turn, assist Australia to effectively conserve biodiversity and meet international obligations. The ongoing challenge will be in empowering Indigenous peoples and their governance structures to implement enduring change.

Topics & Concepts

IndigenousConvention on Biological DiversityBiodiversityTraditional knowledgeCorporate governanceEnvironmental resource managementLegislationDeclarationEnvironmental planningCultural diversityDiversity (politics)Political scienceGeographyBusinessEcologyLawBiologyEnvironmental scienceFinanceEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and BeyondAnimal and Plant Science EducationConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management