Preparedness and Response Strategies for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Incidents in the Middle East and North Africa: An Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Delphi Approach
H. Farhat, Guillaume Alinier, Nidaa Bajow, Alan M Batt, Mariana Helou, Craig Campbell, Heejun Shin, Luc Mortelmans, Arezoo Dehghani, Carolyn Dumbeck, Roberto Mugavero, Walid Abougalala, Saida Zelfani, James Laughton, Gregory R. Ciottone, Mohamed Ben Dhiab
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) incidents require meticulous preparedness, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This study evaluated CBRN response operational flowcharts, tabletop training scenarios methods, and a health sector preparedness assessment tool specific to the MENA region. METHODS: An online Delphi survey engaging international disaster medicine experts was conducted. Content validity indices (CVIs) were used to validate the items. Consensus metrics, including interquartile ranges (IQRs) and Kendall's W coefficient, were utilized to assess the panelists' agreement levels. Advanced artificial intelligence computing methods, including sentiment analysis and machine-learning methods (t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding [t-SNE] and k-means), were used to cluster the consensus data. RESULTS: Forty experts participated in this study. The item-level CVIs for the CBRN response flowcharts, preparedness assessment tool, and tabletop scenarios were 0.96, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively, indicating strong content validity. Consensus analysis demonstrated an IQR of 0 for most items and a strong Kendall's W coefficient, indicating a high level of agreement among the panelists. The t-SNE and k-means identified four clusters with greater European response engagement. CONCLUSIONS: This study validated essential CBRN preparedness and response tools using broad expert consensus, demonstrating their applicability across different geographic areas.