Litcius/Paper detail

Fetoscopic myelomeningocoele closure: Is the scientific evidence enough to challenge the gold standard for prenatal surgery?

E. J. T. Verweij, Martine C. de Vries, Esther J. Oldekamp, Alex J. Eggink, Dick Oepkes, Femke Slaghekke, Jochem K. H. Spoor, Jan Deprest, Jena L. Miller, Ahmet Baschat, Philip DeKoninck

2021Prenatal Diagnosis24 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Since the completion of the Management of Myelomeningocoele Study, maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida has become a valid option for expecting parents. More recently, multiple groups are exploring a minimally invasive approach and recent outcomes have addressed many of the initial concerns with this approach. Based on a previously published framework, we attempt to delineate the developmental stage of the surgical techniques. Furthermore, we discuss the barriers of performing randomized controlled trials comparing two surgical interventions and suggest that data collection through registries is an alternative method to gather high-grade evidence.

Topics & Concepts

Spina bifidaGold standard (test)MedicineFetal surgeryRandomized controlled trialClosure (psychology)SurgeryPregnancyFetusIn uteroBiologyMarket economyGeneticsEconomicsInternal medicineSpinal Dysraphism and MalformationsAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Fetoscopic myelomeningocoele closure: Is the scientific evidence enough to challenge the gold standard for prenatal surgery? | Litcius