Litcius/Paper detail

Peculiarities of Phase Formation in Mn-Based Na SuperIonic Conductor (NaSICon) Systems: The Case of Na<sub>1+2<i>x</i></sub>Mn<sub><i>x</i></sub>Ti<sub>2–<i>x</i></sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> (0.0 ≤ <i>x</i> ≤ 1.5)

Gustautas Snarskis, Jurgis Pilipavičius, Denis Gryaznov, Lina Mikoliūnaitė, Linas Vilčiauskas

2021Chemistry of Materials21 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

2) and other phases. In addition to sodium ordering, the anti-bonding character of the Mn-O bond as compared to Ti-O is suggested as another important factor governing the stability of Mn-based NASICONs. We believe that these results will not only clarify some important questions regarding the thermodynamic properties of NASICON frameworks but will also be helpful for a more general understanding of polyanionic systems.

Topics & Concepts

Fast ion conductorSolid solutionPhase diagramPhase (matter)Monoclinic crystal systemMaterials scienceIonic bondingRietveld refinementCrystallographyElectrolyteChemistryIonElectrodeCrystal structurePhysical chemistryMetallurgyOrganic chemistryAdvancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesTransition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Peculiarities of Phase Formation in Mn-Based Na SuperIonic Conductor (NaSICon) Systems: The Case of Na<sub>1+2<i>x</i></sub>Mn<sub><i>x</i></sub>Ti<sub>2–<i>x</i></sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> (0.0 ≤ <i>x</i> ≤ 1.5) | Litcius