Comparison of widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography with ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography for the evaluation of lesions in retinal vein occlusion
Siying Li, Zeng Qiaozhu, Han Xinyao, Zhang Linqi, Zhao Mingwei, Qu Jinfeng
Abstract
Abstract Background To compare widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) with ultra-widefield fundus fluorescein angiography (UWF-FA) for detecting retinal vein occlusion (RVO) lesions. Methods Thirty-four eyes of 32 patients with treatment-naïve RVO were enrolled at Peking University People’s Hospital from September 2021 to March 2022. Patients were imaged with a UWF-FA (200°) and a widefield SS-OCTA using 24 × 20 mm scan single capture. Quantitative assessments of RVO lesions such as foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and perimeter, non-perfusion areas (NPA), number of microaneurysms (MAs), capillary changes and collateral vessels were performed. Results The measurement of FAZ area and perimeter were comparable between SS-OCTA and UWF-FA (0.373 (range, 0.277–0.48) mm 2 vs. 0.370 (range, 0.277–0.48) mm 2 , P = 0.818 and 2.480 (range, 2.011–2.998) vs. 2.330 (range, 2.027–2.807) mm, P = 0.536, respectively). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of FAZ area and perimeter between SS-OCTA and UWF-FA was high (0.999, [0.997–0.999] and 0.996 [0.991–0.996], respectively), suggesting good agreement. The mean NPA area was larger on SS-OCTA than that on UWF-FA (89.977 ± 78.805 mm 2 vs. 87.944 ± 77.444 mm 2 , P = 0.037). The ICC of NPA area was also high (0.999, [0.999–1.000]). The median of total MA count was less on SS-OCTA than on UWF-FA (7 (range, 0–19) vs.12 (range, 0–23), P < 0.001). Agreement in detecting MAs between SS-OCTA and UWF-FA was found to be good (ICC = 0.920, [0.555–0.974]).The total capillary changes and collateral vessels count were less on UWF-FA than SS-OCTA (11 ± 9 vs 6 ± 7, P < 0.001 and 4 (range, 0–6) vs 0 (range, 0–0), P < 0.001, respectively). Agreement in detecting capillary changes and collateral vessels between OCTA and UWF-FA was found to be fair (ICC = 0.733, [0.081–0.905] and 0.564, [0.039–0.805], respectively). Conclusion Compared with UWF-FA, widefield SS-OCTA was found comparable or even superior in detecting FAZ, NPA, capillary changes and collateral vessels except MAs in RVO. Widefield SS-OCTA may offer a more efficient alternative to FA for diagnosis and monitoring RVO.