The effect of patient ethnicity on the accuracy of peripheral pulse oximetry in patients with COVID‐19 pneumonitis: a single‐centre, retrospective analysis
M. D. Wiles, A. El‐Nayal, Georgina Elton, M. Malaj, Jean Winterbottom, C. Gillies, Iain Moppett, Kris Bauchmüller
Abstract
Summary Pulse oximetry is used widely to titrate oxygen therapy and for triage in patients who are critically ill. However, there are concerns regarding the accuracy of pulse oximetry in patients with COVID‐19 pneumonitis and in patients who have a greater degree of skin pigmentation. We aimed to determine the impact of patient ethnicity on the accuracy of peripheral pulse oximetry in patients who were critically ill with COVID‐19 pneumonitis by conducting a retrospective observational study comparing paired measurements of arterial oxygen saturation measured by co‐oximetry on arterial blood gas analysis (SaO 2 ) and the corresponding peripheral oxygenation saturation measured by pulse oximetry (S p O 2 ). Bias was calculated as the mean difference between SaO 2 and S p O 2 measurements and limits of agreement were calculated as bias ±1.96 SD. Data from 194 patients (135 White ethnic origin, 34 Asian ethnic origin, 19 Black ethnic origin and 6 other ethnic origin) were analysed consisting of 6216 paired SaO 2 and S p O 2 measurements. Bias (limits of agreement) between SaO 2 and S p O 2 measurements was 0.05% (−2.21–2.30). Patient ethnicity did not alter this to a clinically significant degree: 0.28% (1.79–2.35), −0.33% (−2.47–2.35) and −0.75% (−3.47–1.97) for patients of White, Asian and Black ethnic origin, respectively. In patients with COVID‐19 pneumonitis, S p O 2 measurements showed a level of agreement with SaO 2 values that was in line with previous work, and this was not affected by patient ethnicity.