Litcius/Paper detail

Cost–effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis of oliceridine in the treatment of acute pain

Kit N. Simpson, Michael J. Fossler, Linda Wase, Mark A. Demitrack

2021Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Aim: Oliceridine, a new class of μ-opioid receptor agonist, is selective for G-protein signaling (analgesia) with limited recruitment of β-arrestin (associated with adverse outcomes) and may provide a cost-effective alternative versus conventional opioid morphine for postoperative pain. Patients & methods: Using a decision tree with a 24-h time horizon, we calculated costs for medication and management of three most common adverse events (AEs; oxygen saturation <90%, vomiting and somnolence) following postoperative oliceridine or morphine use. Results: Using oliceridine, the cost for managing AEs was US$528,424 versus $852,429 for morphine, with a net cost savings of $324,005. Conclusion: Oliceridine has a favorable overall impact on the total cost of postoperative care compared with the use of the conventional opioid morphine.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineMorphineAnesthesiaOpioidSomnolenceAdverse effectNauseaCost-shiftingHealth careInternal medicineReceptorEconomicsEconomic growthPain Management and Opioid UseAnesthesia and Pain ManagementAnesthesia and Sedative Agents