Litcius/Paper detail

Fosfomycin vs Ertapenem for Outpatient Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study

Noah Wald‐Dickler, Todd C. Lee, Soodtida Tangpraphaphorn, Susan M. Butler‐Wu, Nina Wang, Tyler Degener, Carolyn Kan, Matthew C. Phillips, Edward H. Cho, Catherine P. Canamar, Paul Holtom, Brad Spellberg

2021Open Forum Infectious Diseases13 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Background We sought to determine the comparative efficacy of fosfomycin vs ertapenem for outpatient treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs). Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study involving patients with cUTI treated with outpatient oral fosfomycin vs intravenous ertapenem at 3 public hospitals in Los Angeles County between January 2018 and September 2020. The primary outcome was resolution of clinical symptoms 30 days after diagnosis. Results We identified 322 patients with cUTI treated with fosfomycin (n = 110) or ertapenem (n = 212) meeting study criteria. The study arms had similar demographics, although patients treated with ertapenem more frequently had pyelonephritis or bacteremia while fosfomycin-treated patients had more retained catheters, nephrolithiasis, or urinary obstruction. Most infections were due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, 80%–90% of which were resistant to other oral options. Adjusted odds ratios for clinical success at 30 days, clinical success at last follow-up, and relapse were 1.21 (95% CI, 0.68–2.16), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.46–1.52), and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.52–1.70) for fosfomycin vs ertapenem, respectively. Patients treated with fosfomycin had significant reductions in length of hospital stay and length of antimicrobial therapy and fewer adverse events (1 vs 10). Fosfomycin outcomes were similar irrespective of duration of lead-in intravenous (IV) therapy or fosfomycin dosing interval (daily, every other day, every third day). Conclusions These results would support the conduct of a randomized controlled trial to verify efficacy. In the meantime, they suggest that fosfomycin may be a reasonable stepdown from IV antibiotics for cUTI.

Topics & Concepts

FosfomycinErtapenemMedicineInternal medicineBacteremiaCarbapenemUrinary systemOutpatient clinicSurgeryRetrospective cohort studyMoxifloxacinKlebsiella pneumoniaeAntimicrobialMeropenemAntibioticsAntibiotic resistanceMicrobiologyGeneChemistryBiologyEscherichia coliBiochemistryUrinary Tract Infections ManagementPediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Fosfomycin vs Ertapenem for Outpatient Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study | Litcius