Litcius/Paper detail

Enhanced evasion of neutralizing antibody response by Omicron XBB.1.5, CH.1.1, and CA.3.1 variants

Panke Qu, Julia N. Faraone, John P. Evans, Yi-Min Zheng, Claire Carlin, Mirela Anghelina, Patrick Stevens, Soledad Fernández, Daniel M. Jones, Ashish R. Panchal, Linda J. Saif, Eugene M. Oltz, Baoshan Zhang, Tongqing Zhou, Kai Xu, Richard J. Gumina, Shan‐Lu Liu

2023Cell Reports190 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Omicron subvariants continuingly challenge current vaccination strategies. Here, we demonstrate nearly complete escape of the XBB.1.5, CH.1.1, and CA.3.1 variants from neutralizing antibodies stimulated by three doses of mRNA vaccine or by BA.4/5 wave infection, but neutralization is rescued by a BA.5-containing bivalent booster. CH.1.1 and CA.3.1 show strong immune escape from monoclonal antibody S309. Additionally, XBB.1.5, CH.1.1, and CA.3.1 spike proteins exhibit increased fusogenicity and enhanced processing compared with BA.2. Homology modeling reveals the key roles of G252V and F486P in the neutralization resistance of XBB.1.5, with F486P also enhancing receptor binding. Further, K444T/M and L452R in CH.1.1 and CA.3.1 likely drive escape from class II neutralizing antibodies, whereas R346T and G339H mutations could confer the strong neutralization resistance of these two subvariants to S309-like antibodies. Overall, our results support the need for administration of the bivalent mRNA vaccine and continued surveillance of Omicron subvariants.

Topics & Concepts

NeutralizationBivalent (engine)Neutralizing antibodyAntibodyMonoclonal antibodyChemistryMessenger RNAVirologyImmune escapeMolecular biologyBiologyImmune systemGeneImmunologyBiochemistryMetalOrganic chemistrySARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsBacillus and Francisella bacterial research