Litcius/Paper detail

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a scoping review

Meng Lv, Xufei Luo, Janne Estill, Yunlan Liu, Mengjuan Ren, Jianjian Wang, Qi Wang, Siya Zhao, Xiaohui Wang, Shu Yang, Xixi Feng, Weiguo Li, Enmei Liu, Xianzhuo Zhang, Ling Wang, Qi Zhou, Wenbo Meng, Xiaolong Qi, Yangqin Xun, Xuan Yu, Yaolong Chen, on behalf of the COVID-19 evidence and recommendations working group

2020Eurosurveillance135 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Background In December 2019, a pneumonia caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in Wuhan, China and has rapidly spread around the world since then. Aim This study aims to understand the research gaps related to COVID-19 and propose recommendations for future research. Methods We undertook a scoping review of COVID-19, comprehensively searching databases and other sources to identify literature on COVID-19 between 1 December 2019 and 6 February 2020. We analysed the sources, publication date, type and topic of the retrieved articles/studies. Results We included 249 articles in this scoping review. More than half (59.0%) were conducted in China. Guidance/guidelines and consensuses statements (n = 56; 22.5%) were the most common. Most (n = 192; 77.1%) articles were published in peer-reviewed journals, 35 (14.1%) on preprint servers and 22 (8.8%) posted online. Ten genetic studies (4.0%) focused on the origin of SARS-CoV-2 while the topics of molecular studies varied. Nine of 22 epidemiological studies focused on estimating the basic reproduction number of COVID-19 infection (R 0 ). Of all identified guidance/guidelines (n = 35), only ten fulfilled the strict principles of evidence-based practice. The number of articles published per day increased rapidly until the end of January. Conclusion The number of articles on COVID-19 steadily increased before 6 February 2020. However, they lack diversity and are almost non-existent in some study fields, such as clinical research. The findings suggest that evidence for the development of clinical practice guidelines and public health policies will be improved when more results from clinical research becomes available.

Topics & Concepts

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Public healthMEDLINEFamily medicineMedicineChinaPneumonia2019-20 coronavirus outbreakDiseaseGeographyOutbreakPolitical scienceInfectious disease (medical specialty)VirologyPathologyInternal medicineArchaeologyLawCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts