Litcius/Paper detail

A consensus statement: defining terms for reactivation analysis

Lisa Genzel, George Drăgoi, Loren M. Frank, Karunesh Ganguly, Liset Menéndez de la Prida, Brad E. Pfeiffer, Edwin M. Robertson

2020Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences49 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

During a two-day Royal Society meeting entitled ‘ Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future ’ held at Chicheley Hall in May, 2019, we discussed and defined a set of terms for investigating and reporting in memory reactivations to facilitate a common language and thus simplifying comparison of results. Here, we present the results of the discussion and supply a set of terms such as reactivation and replay, for which the authors have reached a common consensus. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue ‘Memory reactivation: replaying events past, present and future’.

Topics & Concepts

Statement (logic)Set (abstract data type)Cognitive scienceConsensus conferenceComputer scienceEpistemologyPsychologyProgramming languagePhilosophyLibrary scienceMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory
A consensus statement: defining terms for reactivation analysis | Litcius